blinx9900
Super Moderator
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2006
- Messages
- 10,880
No_Fear said:depends dyno and conditions of course,i am talking about dynojet
correct, i am referring to a dynojet aswell. i say we are both right 150-155 max
No_Fear said:depends dyno and conditions of course,i am talking about dynojet
Bull S#^T.
I had short AEM ITR 4-1 header , ITR B-pipe and Mugen Silencer with PCT ECU. Look what I had.
http://www.ek9.org/forum/attachments/engine/2351d1188772273-mugen-ecu-vs-camshafts-dyno3.jpg
170.3 whp and 115.6 Torque
and as all know short intake is not good(hot air)
whats bullshit?
You said : "stock b16b dyno ive seen is about ~155whp"
I had stock.
I had short AEM ITR 4-1 header , ITR B-pipe and Mugen Silencer with PCT ECU. Look what I had.
Yes it does over 200bhp. I beat an 190 bhp RX-8 easily on a straight, and a stock DC2 a car distance. There are a lot of guys on this site reported over 200 bhp with similar mods to mine.......And you miss something crucial Jugbugz. You did not replace your cams with aftermarket ones + other important bolt ons and head work. Unfortunately, your 9 is enough restrictive yet and the Power FC can't do much without these also. Note: My 9 still operates with a V-AFC, and before the end of this month I will install a Power FC(already bought it) so I expect much more also because my engine is healthy enough with 100000 km on the clock. If I'm wrong with what I said about your mods just correct meManos: I don't think you've gotten over 200hp yet. If it was so easy, many Japanese tuners would have done it. Remember SPOON needed 10000rpm to make 200hp and every B16B in HYPER REV mag has not made over 205hp in 1.6L, all needed to be stroked to 1.8 and instantly gained 15-20hp. SPOON's Stroked 2.0L B16B made 240ps with massive torque figures
are we having a misunderstanding on what stock means? also what grade fuel are you running? was the pct stock or modified?
and like jugbugs said, every dyno is different, on the dyno we use we've built 2.0 vtecs with stock internals that couldent make more than 180whp but those same cars were much faster than a car that made 205 on a dynapack...
Yes it does over 200bhp. I beat an 190 bhp RX-8 easily on a straight, and a stock DC2 a car distance. There are a lot of guys on this site reported over 200 bhp with similar mods to mine.......And you miss something crucial Jugbugz. You did not replace your cams with aftermarket ones + other important bolt ons and head work. Unfortunately, your 9 is enough restrictive yet and the Power FC can't do much without these also. Note: My 9 still operates with a V-AFC, and before the end of this month I will install a Power FC(already bought it) so I expect much more also because my engine is healthy enough with 100000 km on the clock. If I'm wrong with what I said about your mods just correct me
And I don't think you have to rev 10000 rpm a B16B to make a lot of power even as N/A
Stock I meant : just had my engine drop in(swap as you know? PICTURES)
stock PCT ECU non-touched and a fuel was 89?
Ok I can agree about DYNO's , they might be different, I was saing I had what I had. I will be disapointed if it will be 155WHP.
I've already mentioned how crap S-AFC or V-AFC are in my first posts on the site, its indeed, it messes up the whole engine timing.....Anyway, I don't know how much hp you would have got with the port n polish but with your S-AFC, theres so many reports that the stock ECU will gradually overwrite the S-AFC, thats just how crap S-AFC is... good thing you getting the Power FC.
Yes but, even if its enough more heavy (very important) I would say that its newer car with a Rotary engine with a lot of torque and more or less similar hp, but its all about vtec I guess......Beating a RX-8 is easy and a stock EK9 can do it, remember you have 150kgs advantage over the RX-8.
What is the My99 WRX and how much hp and torque(approx.) it makes?? Is it the normal 230 hp WRX??I've beaten a mildly boosted MY99 WRX by 5 car lengths rolling from 60kmph to 160kmph with a silencer on and was neck at neck all the way with a DC2R at the same time...that was pretty fun. remembering that I have 5% leak in compression in each cylinder. Also I've gained on a Holden/Vauxhual 360bhp 5.7L V8 1650kg sedan. And my friends B18C EK4 killed a RX7 twin turbo and stock EVO8 easily.
I've already mentioned how crap S-AFC or V-AFC are in my first posts on the site, its indeed, it messes up the whole engine timing.....
Yes but, even if its enough more heavy (very important) I would say that its newer car with a Rotary engine with a lot of torque and more or less similar hp, but its all about vtec I guess......
What is the My99 WRX and how much hp and torque(approx.) it makes?? Is it the normal 230 hp WRX??
when you say that your friends B18C EK4(N/A) "killed" an RX7 twin turbo and stock EVO8 you just refer to the lauch only, right?? Cuz is a bit strange to say that an EK4(even if powered by a B18C) can beat an RX7 twin turbo or EVO 8?? It doesn't make sense to me!
Is that the manual 231 bhp RX8????? That's awful!! That's why the 193 bhp auto is so slow. Its not 200 kg difference but 300 kg. Remember, EK9 weights 1090 kgJust looked up the Specs on the RX8.
-Manual RX8 231bhp 1354kgs
-Auto RX8 193bhp 1381kgs
So I guess you've got almost 200kgs advantage with the Auto.
Manual doesn't look fast... Looks a bit boring...