Zeta S vs Zeta R


Bushell

Bushell

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
1,233
So, if all goes well this weekend i will hopefully in the next week or so be ordering a set of meisters.

I cant make my mind up whether to go for the zeta s or the zeta r.

Car will mostly be used at weekends for fun, would love to track it eventually.. just wanted to know if the zeta r's are worth going for or just to go with the s model. What's peoples opinions?
 
Iirc the zeta r are heavier spring rates and pillowball top mounts?
I beleive you can specify heavier rates on zeta s though?
 
Yeah i think zeta r are more track orientated which is making me lean a bit more towards the s as i will be on the road a lot more and dont want a crashy ride.

Yeah logan it does but i fancy trying meisters.
 
If you got BCs on it, Its pointless buying Meister's. They are very very similar in design and performance. Hard to tell them apart. Compared this with a friends teg with same mods and same spring rates as my Meister's
 
Yeah i have been told this already. Just something i want to try though. :rolleyes:
 
Was just about to say what @irf said.

I wouldn't change them for Meisters the difference will be absolutely minimal if any.
 
  • Like
Reactions: irf
Softer springs is the better option if it's primarily a road car.
 
I had zeta r on the crx. On full soft they were still pretty compliant on the roads. Not crashy at all. And it was fully stripped out
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top