Just back from the dyno!!


S

steveonagle

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2008
Messages
337
Well got back their really happy with the b18 made 205.5BHP 144 lb ft and 173.6BHP at the wheels 28.7 bhp power loss not bad i thought anyway
il scan up printout later:nice::drive:
 
JIMBOB-EK9 said:
Congrats mate!:clap:

Spec??
What dyno was this on????
Click to expand...

martin treacy westward eng on a Maha LPS 13
mugen cai, mugen twinloop,decat,centre section removed for a straight pipe apexi neo mapped by martin 1.5(unknown agressive plated diff) and a 4.7 other than that pretty standard really
 
steveonagle said:
martin treacy westward eng on a Maha LPS 13
mugen cai, mugen twinloop,decat,centre section removed for a straight pipe apexi neo mapped by martin 1.5(unknown agressive plated diff) and a 4.7 other than that pretty standard really
Click to expand...

Very tastefully modified!:bow:
Congrats once agen!:clap:
 
very nice figures...she must be healthy:):)

very similar to my figures!

what was your bhp figure before the neo map?
 
do you have a video?
am very interested in hearing the mugen twinloop with a straight through pipe.
Does it sound noticable louder?
 
Healthy figures, though i think MAHA's arent the most accurate..

My car made 216BHP & 144lbs/ft on one of them...:nono: quote-me-happy.com

Babyface...Dont be tempted to run your Twinloop with no CAT. I was forced to do this before my hiflow was modded & it sounded "AWFUL":shocked:
 
graham084 said:
very nice figures...she must be healthy:):)

very similar to my figures!

what was your bhp figure before the neo map?
Click to expand...
it was 194 bhp timing was out to retarded too much tis similar to your car in more ways than one man

babyface said:
do you have a video?
am very interested in hearing the mugen twinloop with a straight through pipe.
Does it sound noticable louder?
Click to expand...
no have no video mine isnt that loud at all because ive used a dc2 twinloop rather than ek9 one of the lads has the same as me but with ek9 twinloop and it sounds lovely and is loud enough under load
chrismc_DC2 said:
Healthy figures, though i think MAHA's arent the most accurate..

My car made 216BHP & 144lbs/ft on one of them...:nono: quote-me-happy.com

Babyface...Dont be tempted to run your Twinloop with no CAT. I was forced to do this before my hiflow was modded & it sounded "AWFUL":shocked:
Click to expand...

ya man not really sure what to make of dyno results anywhere as theres so many factors but i was there to get the NEO mapped and it is definately alot quicker and smoother to drive tbh honest martin treacy's dyno is regarded as one of the most accurate in ireland
 
i got 175 up there with my old sir with v2 and 5zigen manifold he knows his stuff i trust the dyno dynamics more
 
BULLSHIT....westwards dyno is the most accurate in irl end of story...

sure my mates evo7 put down 401bhp on a dastek @ai autos...

down on the maha 365bhp.....(QUOTE ME HAPPY?) not at all!

westward engineering =QUOTE ME ACCURATELY !:)
 
:clap:

Regardless of claimed BHP...

A "true" peak of 150lbs/ft of torque at the flywheel from an 1800??

You REALLY think it makes that much?:shocked:

EDIT: I think you would find it would make less on Dyno-dynamics....you dont gain ~15-20lbs/ft more peak torque over a stock motor (~130) with a few bolt ons & a map...

You are entitled to think what you will though....
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top