Tegiwa Imports
EK9 Dealer
- Joined
- May 20, 2007
- Messages
- 2,717
I think the spoon is a step backwards?? no?
I think the spoon is a step backwards?? no?
Unsure to be honest, theres no evidence I've seen to suggest it's a step backwards though.
I thought the spoon design is more for peak gains and thought it would compliment a B20 that is already going to have big gains in low and midrange over the B16B.
so 7.2bhp more than jdm 4-1?
Zen , what was your dyno results after the remap?
peak power isnt everything
Would have to agree with tegiwa there. the b20's seem to like big long tube primary+secondary manifiolds like the tri-y designes. Where as the spoon seems to go the other way benig shorter more compact.
so 7.2bhp more than jdm 4-1?
http://www.ek9.org/forum/honda-inte...dyno-results-stock-integra-type-r-engine.html
so Tegiwa looking at that then your saying your manifold would even out perform toda itself?
Zen , what was your dyno results after the remap?
peak power isnt everything
Ours will beat all the other manifolds listed. The only real fitment issue is that one hole needs to be drilled larger, takes around 5 mins
Johnny
Has this issue been sorted now? As in, if I order one tomorrow all the bolt holes will line up? Really want to buy one of these
Cheers
Not disagreeing with you as you may be right, I don't know.
The spoon 4-2-1 I have is almost a 4-1 manifold as the primaries are nearly the full length of the manifold unitll they merge into 2 then 1 near the end (see below)
What evidence do you have that suggests this would not be favourable with a B20 ???