b18c dyno today 201whp :) stock end hytech replica

[nunoski]

im back from the dyno today very pleased my coupe got 201whp 130tr

2 weeks ago i got 187whp the only change from then was a hytech tri y big tube replica most pleople told me that header is way to big for a b18c stock so not true, man awsome! header i got 14whp extra. very happy with this numbers for now hehehe

 

[689R]

where you from? im guessing usa

 

[nunoski]

yes Puerto RICO USA

why

 

[Mr. Clean]

yes Puerto RICO USA

why

Theres a discussion going on about how power friendly US dynos are lol
post the graph meng

 

[nunoski]

ohh LOL well i will post the graph tomorrow i will scanned it at work and post it was on a dyno jet

my mods are:
b18c r with lsd 4.78 tranny

skunk2 tuner stage 3 cams
skunks2 retainer and springs
bosh 255 fuel pump
fuel regulator
skunks cam gear
omi power 70 throttle match ported ITR mani
crome ecu with a great tuner ( el nazi)
2.5 customs ext with magnaflow
hytech replica header
dc2 air box customs modifications
act clutch

well thats it for most parts

when i had 186whp 2 to 3 weeks ago we ran 13.8 1/4 so friendly dynos or not i think not bad maybe a can go 13.5 or so now

any recommendations on next upgrade? maybe high comp ctr pistons? or i should save and then stroket put some dalton 84mm etc?

 

[689R]

aha! you said b18c stock dude!

187whp sounds about right for that setup. thats a fast QM time too, what tyres you using?

Id consider CP pistons

 

[nunoski]

i did not say stock , if you read the title it says stock end

 

[nunoski]

tire bf Goodrich drag those work like magic

 

[nunoski]

cp pistons what Compression could i get and what numbers could i gain

 

[BeRTiNi]

uou!!!
video or dyno?

 

[KieranEG6]

aha! you said b18c stock dude!

187whp sounds about right for that setup. thats a fast QM time too, what tyres you using?

Id consider CP pistons

i did not say stock , if you read the title it says stock end


"is way to big for a b18c stock so not true"

I also thought he meant stock! Is the reason i looked at the post

I thought the "end" was in reference to somthing about the header.

 

[nunoski]

oh!!! now reading it together your right! my mistake it did sound like that

sorry it was not my intention